When will the subservient person set a point of return for themselves?

Nazhad Osman Saed – Activist

It is undeniable that humans are considered the wisest creatures on earth. However, it is precisely these individuals who succumb to misunderstanding, denial, and rejection of the truth that permeates society, or at least their immediate environment. This often transforms them into a cancerous tumor, infiltrating the very blood and bones of society.
How long will individuals allow themselves to be treated as worthless before their masters, presidents, or leaders? Why do they not assert the same human dignity as their fellow beings? This humiliation is irrational and deeply provoking. One might attempt to explain to them that they are trapped in a slumber of neglect, to act as a loyal savior, hoping to inspire pride, strength, happiness, and mental clarity, rather than becoming a subject of proverbs and ridicule within their homes, among their children, on social media, and on television screens. Yet, they respond with “You have to understand,” or simply remain dismissive, laughing at your suggestions.
A recent example of this self-imposed subservience, which trended on social media, involved numerous individuals from Erbil, Said Sadiq, and other areas who walked to the grave of Jalal Talabani, known as “Mam.” This occurred while the PUK struggles to protect its own cadres from the violence of the PDK, Turkey, and other entities. Despite this, new individuals arrive, seemingly without concern, wearing numbers and declaring themselves disciples of Talabani’s sons and Mam’s path, all for a “bread of shame.”
The PUK’s latest internal strife involves the disappearance of three party cadres in Shiladze on June 9th of this year: Dyar Nazmi Sitayi, Hemn Taymus Bayaz Sitayi, and Safin Ali Ismail Sitayi. This is compounded by a renewed, intense media war, accusing the PUK of supporting and collaborating with the Turkish intelligence agency against Sulaymaniyah and P/KK, while simultaneously reopening old wounds from the civil war and expressing a disturbing sense of satisfaction.
In summary:
Can a party, facing such internal and regional challenges, effectively defend its cadres and protect their rights? To speak of defending the rights of a nation is futile when, if divine displeasure were to befall a people, they might be subjected to the rule of the PUK and KDP.

Editor: Diyar Harki